The Candidates' Culture Clash
Written by hyanygo
One of the surprises of the recent Presidential radio debate was the 20 minute long discussion on culture. Here's two of the highlights from that debate.
The under-used culture hub
[flash=300,300]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9WmcH5AEqQ[/flash]
(Youtube - 5 mins)
The reason for the under-use of the culture hub, according to Common-Sense Politics (CSP), is that it simply has not been a priority of past administrations. His administration, he says, will make it a priority.
CSP is clever enough in this debate to quickly turn the issue to what he sees as his opponent's weakness. Whilst acknowledging that both he and Calvin Coolidge (Calvin) share the priority of getting foreign visitors into our Weekend Games, CSP is left confused at the rest of Calvin's plans.
CSP rubbishes Calvin's other three planks of: survivor, religions row and an interregional festival. CSP says that survivor is already running, that religions row is just merely spam and the interregional festival is too ill-defined to be a policy in its own right. Calvin responds that far from being a spam game, the activity in Religions Row has been high and (Calvin will later claim) that the activity there is exactly the sort of roleplay Europeia needs. In other words, unlike real-life, religion works!.
CSP fires back that he sees it as odd that Calvin places religion so high on his cultural policy and then Calvin shutters the first part of the debate by claiming that contests just don't work.
The question for Europeia is: Is either candidate right? I think that both of them are not. Religion and contests are too weak to base a cultural strategy off. I don't think that either one in the isolation that both candidates seem to be putting them in would achieve the results that they want. Contests are just not quite the right tool for the end goals CSP is aiming for, and religion is too weak to drive cultural policy.
Roleplay
[flash=300,300]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QRPc2trUq1U[/flash]
(Youtube - 3 mins)
Calvin starts the second sub-debate asking CSP why roleplay should feature so prominently in CSP's strategy. CSP responds by saying that we've done roleplay all wrong and what is needed is a "simulation" roleplay that does not require the traditional sort of effort of the past. The Culture Ministry under CSP would then be in charge of helping the process play out.
Calvin, unsurprisingly, thinks that simulations are a mistake and are bound to fail. Sports roleplay, according to Calvin, has been a failure and the only success has been religion because it is low effort.
The question for Europeia is: should we do roleplay, and if so, what kind? I think Calvin is less wrong than CSP here but neither has the sharpness of vision to merge both roleplay and religion. I've heard that the Culture Ministry does have something interesting planned and I await their announcement.
Answer the poll above and take part in the conversation below!