Short Title: Bring in the Clowns

HEM

former
Jorts Connoisseur
Honoured Citizen
Citizen
Pronouns
he / him / his
Short Title: Bring in the Clowns
Long Title: Another reason I can't take the Ascendancy seriously
By Private Citizen HEM Tiberius Anumia

By now, it would be my assumption that many people within the gameplay realm are aware of the spats between Europeia and two other regions: The Kodiak Republic and Unknown. While there are many differing angles to look upon the events, it culminated into one of the largest assembly of misinformed gameplayers I have seen since the FRA invasion of a legal and established LKE colony. Truly.

The events aside, the reactions from some regions were hysterical. One particular gem is a statement from the "Ascendancy" -- a region that would put the Chiss to shame. My first impression of this region was the apparent boasting of a gaudy skin filled with a handful of players who may have been less than cooperative during the EIA investigation of last summer's porn spam attacks.

Anyway, allow me to provide the full text of their statement so that I may not pick and chose, or perform any bias in my portrayal of their words:

"We, The Ascendancy, find the Europeian approach to the regions of The Kodiak Republic and Unknown reprehensible and uncouth. Despite Europeia’s self-assertion as leaders of the civilized world, they appear undignified and cold in their treatment of Unknown and The Kodiak Republic. We ask for Europeia's government to cease its actions immediately, and to formally apologize to both respected realms.

Unknown's treatment by the former President of Europeia is quite odd, even appalling, and implying that Unknown should be a mere protectorate thereof is both comical and perplexing. The behavior of the President should have been quickly remedied because the head of ORI, Avakael, was willing to work with her and back out of her touchy comments -- yet she kept pushing through.

We wish to add that we support the revolution brought forth by the founder of The Kodiak Republic, Rykkland, against The Most Serene Republic of Kodiak and its government under President Seymour. We also deem the current government under President Rob to be the legitimate government of The Kodiak Republic."

It is "reprehensible" to condemn those who overthrow democratically elected governments? It is "uncouth" to call for the sustaining of democratic institutions? I am curious as to what universe the "Universal Senate" or the "Holy Trinity" is operating in. Europeia has a long and storied history at supporting the governments that were supported at the ballot boxes in regions. I point any curious for precedent to the Europeian support toward the original government in the Republic of Ireland after the root administrator made a power play of his own. This is a tenant of Europeian foreign policy.

Which is perhaps why I find it so amusing that the Ascendancy can -- with a straight face -- argue that we only supported the democratically elected government because of our "interests" there. Speaking as (an admittedly semi active) Supreme Chancellor, I had no idea who was President in the Kodiak. It just happened to be someone who has a role in Europeia aswell. Yippee? That totally influenced us toward enforcing a foreign policy that is older than the Lexian influence in Europeia. Totally makes sense d00d.

Is the new reign supported by the people in the Kodiak? I hope so. Because that means a potential for the region to live still exists. I want the Kodiak to live. I want the Kodiak to be active. The more active regions there are, the more active our game is. That's a good thing. But to say that we should immediately bearhug an under-the-table coup de tat that circumvented democracy is ludicrous. Simply out of lockstep with historic precedent.

And when it comes to Unknown, Europeia is obviously completely in the wrong. Clearly, Unknown had a noble diplomat discussing with us for the entirety of the issue. Especially when we had a new President with a pro-Unknown agenda. Especially after I personally, along with a corp of concerned Europeians, tried to work to fix the relationship. Avakael had totally no reason to create this soap opera in the first place -- after all -- he is a loyal invader with only invader interests at heart. Clearly his version of the story is the one to trust, because of how consistent and reliable he is. He would have no motive to divide or harm the unity of invading regions. None...at...all...

Oops..

Were the words spoken by Rachel Anumia were below the par we have come to expect? Yes. Do I fully expect there to be a domestic political backlash toward her? Yes indeed. But when time came to call a spade a spade and get back to work, there was nobody in Unknown who wanted to negotiate or work out our differences. Perhaps, the above link begins to show why Mr. Avakael had so little concern toward..actually working toward any resolution. Just perhaps. I'm only speculating.

As they condemned us unilaterally though, the Ascendancy must have deemed the lies and distortions pushed by Unknown to be insignificant. I guess the "Universal Synod" considered it irrelevant that Unknown inaccurately played a petty blame game, as the servants of Cruor flailed wildly (and inaccurately) at us as the gates of evil.

In the end, either I am the biggest barefaced liar in this game, or I'm not. Either Europeia spies on our allies, or we don't. Either Europeia supports kangaroo courts (and executive branches...?) abroad, or we don't.

I understand that we aren't going to be beloved by all. I get it. We invade, we have harsh politics, we alienate people. But the sheer...rubbish-ness of this statement is a profound statement to how far the quality of diplomacy has fallen in Nationstates. Not once did the Ascendancy offer to speak with the Europeian government. Not once did they issue a demand to anyone in the "know" in Europeia before this statement, and apparently not once did they consider whether the content of their statement was utter bollocks.

It's a sad state of affairs. But I suppose to cheer us up, we can resume the sending in of the clowns.

This ENN op-ed was written by HEM Tiberius. HEM is the founder of Europeia and has previously served as Prime Minister of the Land of Kings and Emperors, Steward of Hampshire, rabblerouser and nuisance in several feeders, and currently holds the post of Europeian Supreme Chancellor. He has previously written "The Deceit of Defenderism" as an ENN editorial. As always, he speaks from the media as a private citizen and nothing within these texts should be taken as an official statement of the Europeian government or any other region HEM has previously or currently resides in.

P.S. Just because we don't invoke the Legend of Zelda triforce doesn't make us not the leader of the civilized world.

P.P.S. Grand Admiral Thrawn likes us better.
 
Rykkland stopped being supreme overlord? I didn't really notice. -_-

The Ascendancy never takes itself too seriously, its a combination of several sci-fi parodies/spoofs taken from across the genre (system lords aka Stargate), alongside its own distinct mythos, and role play setting.

I don't like the announcement the Ascendancy made (or rather don't understand it), but when it comes to all things Kodiak I switch off, and find some video on you tube. But in the end this is a condemnation of sorts, which can be moved on from.

In my memory Kodiak has always been even at the best of times, a form of tyranny of the majority, personality cult or a region with strong ideological views carried by its members (in terms of social conservatism, social democracy and socialism).

I would call it a bitter political landscape over there that makes 10k seem like heaven on earth in comparison, but I have moved on from my time there. Hating Kodiak would be irrational, ignoring it for me (unless they made some crazy accusations) was always the best policy.

As for the future, we don't have an active government (in terms of Foreign Affairs at least) till the merger between New Britannia gets underway in late January. I would call for a cup of tea with Europeia otherwise, and its not something to kill relations indefinitely over.
 
The Ascendancy never takes itself too seriously, its a combination of several sci-fi parodies/spoofs taken from across the genre (system lords aka Stargate), alongside its own distinct mythos, and role play setting.

Then they shouldn't be commenting about anything that holds significance. Full Stop.
 
The Ascendancy never takes itself too seriously, its a combination of several sci-fi parodies/spoofs taken from across the genre (system lords aka Stargate), alongside its own distinct mythos, and role play setting.
Then they shouldn't be commenting about anything that holds significance. Full Stop.
In fact the people I know who are involved in the Ascendancy take themselves more seriously than anyone else I happen to have run into.
 
The Ascendancy never takes itself too seriously, its a combination of several sci-fi parodies/spoofs taken from across the genre (system lords aka Stargate), alongside its own distinct mythos, and role play setting.

Then they shouldn't be commenting about anything that holds significance. Full Stop.
Not what I meant, the people there have a lot of pride about the region, but they don't turn people away on the basis of being defender or raider, or because of some ideological position they may hold. That is what I imply for not taking themselves [too] seriously.

Citizens are expected to have some loyalty to the region, and show respect/reverence for the Royal family, the King, and/or the Gods, if they wish to rise significantly through the political ranks. On this basis the statements of the crown (if I could call it that given our political structure) are given respect, regardless of the content, even if members of the region disagree with it, in which case they are free to make their opinions known.

But the region is meant to be on the side of the government (for obvious reasons of unity and brotherhood of sorts), so while statements of the crown are the statements of the government, it would incorrect to postulate that all members of the government and the region share their views/support of them, beyond that of loyalty to the crown. Certainly I don't share the views of the crown, but accept them on the basis of loyalty to the crown.
 
Interesting article, HEM.

One of your better ones.
 
An interesting article posted during the festive period!

Thank you HEM for your work during this busy time. With such I award you and this article a Journalism Award:

 
Last name? EPIC.
 

What you fail to realize, HEM, is that Seymour is Europeia. :p

I would berate the Ascendancy for their transparent sycophancy, except that the folks in Kodiak ate it up. I don't know if folks in Unknown took similar pleasure in having their asses kissed.
 
What you fail to realize, HEM, is that Seymour is Europeia. :p

I would berate the Ascendancy for their transparent sycophancy, except that the folks in Kodiak ate it up. I don't know if folks in Unknown took similar pleasure in having their asses kissed.
http://youtu.be/KKH9SlrYp98?t=10s


but yeah, they also were saying that we think we are "all of nationstates" so... :wacko:

but rofl, Skizzy: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0heL2Czeraw

I AAAAMMMM, EEURRRROOOPEEEIIIAAAA!

 
The Ascendancy never takes itself too seriously, its a combination of several sci-fi parodies/spoofs taken from across the genre (system lords aka Stargate), alongside its own distinct mythos, and role play setting.

Then they shouldn't be commenting about anything that holds significance. Full Stop.
Not what I meant, the people there have a lot of pride about the region, but they don't turn people away on the basis of being defender or raider, or because of some ideological position they may hold. That is what I imply for not taking themselves [too] seriously.

Citizens are expected to have some loyalty to the region, and show respect/reverence for the Royal family, the King, and/or the Gods, if they wish to rise significantly through the political ranks. On this basis the statements of the crown (if I could call it that given our political structure) are given respect, regardless of the content, even if members of the region disagree with it, in which case they are free to make their opinions known.

But the region is meant to be on the side of the government (for obvious reasons of unity and brotherhood of sorts), so while statements of the crown are the statements of the government, it would incorrect to postulate that all members of the government and the region share their views/support of them, beyond that of loyalty to the crown. Certainly I don't share the views of the crown, but accept them on the basis of loyalty to the crown.
Well I'm sorry but that's just ludicrous. :p

It's just a blanket excuse for the members to accept their Leaders as tyrannical dictators, and to try to pull a thin veil over the blatant hypocracy of it all. :lol:

It's with nonsense excuses like this that you can run any kind of populist tyranny - whether that be the Ascendancy or the UDL it matters not what the ideology is - but what the means are. Their means are through the populist dictatorship techniques, and they too judge others by criteria they couldn't possibly measure up to themselves. But, yeah, to the UDL's defense, at least they actually stand for something that I profess is remotely coherent, the same couldn't be said for TA.
 
Well I'm sorry but that's just ludicrous.  :p

It's just a blanket excuse for the members to accept their Leaders as tyrannical dictators, and to try to pull a thin veil over the blatant hypocracy of it all.  :lol:
*Is not part of the TA govt*
*Retired from NS politics*

Kinky! :eek:rly:

But yeah, retired from this crazy stuff, so my head stopped spinning. It's all too confusing. :mellow:
 
Back
Top