Resident Curmudgeon Notolecta Criticizes Publication of Joint Statement




Resident Curmudgeon Notolecta Criticizes Publication of Joint Statement Blasting Invaders Field Marshal Gest for Sexist Remarks
By Deepest House








(Europeia – April 13, 2017) – Notolecta, a well-known Europeian curmudgeon, criticized President Calvin Coolidge and his new administration for its joint-statement released in cooperation with the Kingdom of Great Britain, Balder, The North Pacific, The West Pacific, the United Kingdom, and Osiris. The regions condemned Invaders Field Marshall Gest for sexist comments about a female player.

Gest compared a female player to a whore and prostitute, resulting in the inter-regional statement. “Comments like these only contribute to a widespread problem and perpetuate harmful conduct against women,” the statement read. “In light of this, military and diplomatic relations of any kind between the signatories and The Invaders are hereby suspended.”

Europeia and its partner regions took a strong stand against chauvinism and misogyny through this statement, however Notolecta called the public statement a mistake. “This definitely reveals we need to change something with the EAAC and how we approach FA advisory systems,” he said. “I am really waiting to see if this spurs any changes for future FA matters, especially considering this isn’t the first time we’ve made an avoidable mistake.”

The mistake to which Notolecta refers is publicly naming and accusing Gest on the NationStates page for actions that occurred outside of the main NationStates page, in violation of the NationStates forum rules. “We knew this rule existed, and we’ve run afoul in the past,” he said. “There is a lot of stretching here to say that posting this in gameplay wasn’t a mistake.”

“I don’t view this as a mistake, in any way,” said Brunhilde, a former Europeian Minister of Foreign Affairs, and founder of the Coalition Against Ideology of Nazism. “The message did exactly what it was intended to do and sent a clean, clear message about the harassment of female players that has too often gone ignored in favor of increased raiding power.”

Others joined Brunhilde in support of the statement. “You continue to ignore the fact that the administration did consider the rules carefully, and did take reasonable measure to make sure that, based on past precedent, the statement would not violate the rules,” said r3naissanc3r. “Yet you somehow continue to attempt to use this issue as an excuse to accuse the administration of mishandling the situation and, going several steps further, to call for wide reform in how the region handles FA.”

Malashaan, a renowned legal expert in Europeia and current Speaker of the Senate, joined in support of the statement. “I just want to clarify that when I said we should be respectful of the rule in the future, I was not implying that we were not in this instance,” he explained. “The statement was carefully considered and posted in the belief that it was within what is allowed by the rule.”

Notolecta remained undeterred, however. “The people they consulted obviously just wanted ot [sic] make this statement strongly so bad they couldn’t see the obvious because people did see this was going to get moderator action long before it occurred,” he rambled on. “We shouldn’t act like this getting stuck by moderator action was something no one could see coming; it could and should have been seen before it got published, regardless of how many people you pass it by the fact that it wasn’t is a failure.”

Notolecta’s singular voice of opposition to the published statement stands in stark contrast to many of the region’s most influential leaders. During the past election, many in the region clamored for Europeia to take a larger and more prominent role in GamePlay affairs. Gest’s comments offered Europeia the opportunity to demonstrate international leadership by taking a firm stand against unacceptable conduct before the eyes of the NationStates world. The severing of military and diplomatic ties sends a strong and united message to The Invaders that Europeia and other signatory regions will not tolerate such conduct.
 
Someone has a view you disagree with? Write them off as a curmudgeon and mischaracterize their position. This article suggests that I oppose any gameplay statement on the matter and that isn't true. I object so let to the publishing this specific statement in gameplay with it's specific wording because it was against the rules. My opposition to this does not say anything about my stance on the invaders, who we didn't really work with anyway and I have always been against working with, or an increased presence in gameplay, which I am for.
 
I don't agree with Noto's statements in the thread itself, but this article title is inappropriately named. To me, it looks like someone in power using the advantage of media to hurt a fellow citizen's reputation by calling them a 'curmudgeon' and diminishing what they have to say. Personally, I'm in favor of the statement, but this looks more like an attack on an almost defenseless player than a critical source of news.
 
JayDee said:
I'm in favor of the statement, but this looks more like an attack on an almost defenseless player than a critical source of news.
Regardless of ones thoughts on the article... I don't think I would ever refer to Notolecta as defenseless. :p
 
Oh Noto is certainly a curmudgeon, but there are better ways to title your articles in lieu of straight out bashing another player.

@Aex-That comment stemmed from the fact that Noto doesn't have the same access to the EBC as Deepest House does.
 
JayDee said:
@Aex-That comment stemmed from the fact that Noto doesn't have the same access to the EBC as Deepest House does.
Duh, few besides the President and Vice President have the same access to the EBC as MinComm does.

Noto, however, can argue circles around... Well, a better portion of our citizenry. Arguing that this is article's titling is improper is understandable, but calling Noto defenseless is silly. :p
 
Yeah this strikes a bad balance between informative and a bit inflammatory. Not that I agree with Noto's initial argument.
 
I mean, yeah, I don't think the namecalling is as bad as others are making it out to be.
 
It's not about what he's being called, but the fact that someone committed a breach of protocol in article writing and used a title to flame (if only slightly) a fellow player. That and the fact that Noto was also upset by the title, I'm more inclined to agree with the person who was targeted than the people trying to play it down like it's nothing.
 
Seven Deaths said:
I mean, yeah, I don't think the namecalling is as bad as others are making it out to be.
Well, I have been called a "deaf retard" on several occasions in other communities out of NS so I gotta agree that the name-calling in this article really isn't THAT bad.
 
JayDee said:
It's not about what he's being called, but the fact that someone committed a breach of protocol in article writing and used a title to flame (if only slightly) a fellow player. That and the fact that Noto was also upset by the title, I'm more inclined to agree with the person who was targeted than the people trying to play it down like it's nothing.
The main reason I wish that the phrase "curmudgeon" hadn't been used is because that is not becoming the story (and I'm as guilty as anyone) versus the point of the story. I wouldn't consider "curmudgeon" to be a flame on the NS forums, so to call it a flame seems like a stretch.
 
I actually think there wouldn't be many comments here at all had the word "curmudgeon" not been used.
 
Seven Deaths said:
Jesus. Millennials.
Mhm.

There's nothing wrong with this article. 'Curmudgeon' is not a pejorative. If you have a problem with it, write your own damn article. That's how this is supposed to work, not demanding that the EBC operate how you would like it to. Private media doesn't struggle because of some fundamental collective failure, it's because ya'll are lazy.
 
Common-Sense Politics said:
Seven Deaths said:
Jesus. Millennials.
Mhm.

There's nothing wrong with this article. 'Curmudgeon' is not a pejorative. If you have a problem with it, write your own damn article. That's how this is supposed to work, not demanding that the EBC operate how you would like it to. Private media doesn't struggle because of some fundamental collective failure, it's because ya'll are lazy.
Yup.
 
Agreed with SD and CSP, minus the jab at millenials. Curmudgeon is neither pejorative nor an insult nor flaming.
 
Back
Top