Malaise Abounds as Senate Standing Opens




Malaise Abounds as Senate Standing Opens
May 2017 Pre-Standing Poll Results
Written by McEntire








(Europeia - May 5, 2017) - With Senate elections now open, the EBC polled to determine the mood of voters and we found a general sense of low expectations. 23 citizens participated in our poll, of which 43.5 percent were older members (those who joined before 2015), and 56.5 percent were newer members (those who joined in 2015 or later). The poll includes a section on the current Senate, a snapshot of the current term, and finally peoples' views on the election now underway. To the results!

Current Senate



The current Senate holds a middling approval rating of 39.1 percent, with 30.4 percent disapproving and 30.4 percent unsure. This represents a high level of uncertainty at the end of the term, and is not exactly a ringing endorsement of the current Senate's work. While the entire Senate may have received lukewarm ratings, our poll showed that approval ratings for individual Senators came in all over the map.

While voters didn't give the Senate very high marks, they seemed to appreciate its leadership. Speaker Malashaan received the highest approval rating of any senator by far, with 82.6 percent approving of his job performance. One disgruntled voter, who registered as "other" in our poll, said of Malashaan, "Mal will get a good review for being Mal not for being a Senator." But generally among the electorate, the Speaker is in a good position.

Both Senator Cerian Quilor and Senator Isaris were reasonably popular, with 60.9 percent and 47.8 percent approval, respectively. Senator Quilor may be more highly approved of, but both of these Senators have disapproval ratings near 20 percent and a relatively high number of poll respondents "not sure" on their performance.

The newest addition to our legislative body, Senator Seven Deaths, appears not to have made an impression on voters yet, or at very least not a good one. More than a quarter of poll respondents rated him negatively, and nearly half say that they are not sure about his job performance. Those who voted "other" made remarks that his short tenure left them unable to judge him.

Finally, the most polarizing of the group is Senator JayDee. Tied with Malashaan for the lowest number of respondents "not sure", almost everyone in the poll registered some opinion on JayDee's term. While only 30.4 percent approved of his performance in office, that is not too much lower than the approval for the Senate overall. Had JayDee chosen to seek re-election, he may have had problems with the electorate given that his disapproval sits at a sky-high 56.5 percent, double that of the next-most-disapproved Senator. Comments on JayDee note that he may have been too harsh on Cabinet nominees.

When asked about the greatest achievements of this Senate, voters tend to say three things: nothing, CAIN 2.0, or working with the Citizens' Assembly. When asked about failings, they identified a lack of real progress and the process of Cabinet nominations. In terms of additional comments, a couple of folks praised JayDee for his effort as a Senator and contributing to discussion.

Ratification of CAIN 2.0

Chair Elections Corrections Amendment (2017)

Cain 2.0

None

Getting started on a rewrite for the Judicature Act

Activity and discussion.

Not sure

Working with the CA

Passing CAIN 2.0.

I don't know if there's been a singular accomplishment, but there have been a number of interesting discussions driven by a small group of Senators.

I can't say I've really seen much to rave about from the senate this term.

Nothing

CPAA

Executive Order 95 .10 :p

Wait the senate accomplished something? Beyond routine confirmations and a few treaty ratifications that always pass regardless and are already written, the only thing that has been done is a handful of tiny edits that while nessarry aren't significant accomplishments.

Replacing Grizz

Not sure

Ratification of CAIN

The Political Ethics Amendment. While the bill itself isn't very impressive, the process which created it shows precisely how the interaction between the Senate and the Assembly should be.

Approving the CAIN treaty, I guess

It hasn't passed much or anything but it has laid a lot of ground work for the next Senate. I think it's done a lot of good work just only people who view the Senate discussion will see that good work.

Prefer not to answer

Making the WA Deputies accountable to the Senate, which was actually something started in the last term.
Activity

Tedious questioning from Senator Jaydee regarding Calvin's nominees

Judicature

Everything

Lot's of activity at first, but all that momentum went away after the Presidential elections

Confirmations of the cabinet.

Not Sure

Confirmations

Malashaan and Isaris are the workhorses.

HEM's resignation, Grizzli's absence, and Isaris's focus on other endeavors left the Senate pretty inactive for awhile in the middle.

A lack of progress.


Personal quarrels

Consistency.

The lack of any real progress or work getting done.

Approving Rand

Communication to others on the laws which have been passed.

JayDee, basically. It's hard to choose between the ridiculous Confirmation Hearings and the failed Judicature Rewrite. A thorough examination of a nominee is understandable, but it just felt like he had something to prove. The Judicature Rewrite is far too ambitious a project for a junior Senator, and the bill is in an unusable state. Will anything come of all that discussion?
.
Kinda answered above. Good that it's laid a lot of groundwork, but actually passing a bill would be nice.

Seems like a caretaker term, to be honest. PAA doesn't seem to really have done much because no solution for conflicts of interest was put forward, a few loopholes were patched up, and some FA treaty things were done.

Current Term



While it is early in the term, President Calvin Coolidge has a dismal 26.1 percent approval rating, with 34.8 percent disapproving. Even so, Europeians are divided on whether or not the region is headed in the right direction. By a margin on 52.2-47.8, poll respondents said we are headed in the right direction.

In what may be an opportunity for the President, Europeians have much more faith in the Executive branch to make change than they do in the Senate. 60.9 percent say the Executive is more capable of making change, while only 17.4 percent believe that the Senate can, with 21.7 percent believing they are equally capable. The poll indicates that if the President wants to change the minds of the 47.8 percent that believe we're on the wrong track, the region believes that his branch of government is the one to do it.



In terms of what citizens think requires the greatest change, many say the Citizens' Assembly. Surprisingly, the next highest is the Chancellery, followed by World Assembly and Senate in a tie. Those who voted "other" responded that day-today communications and foreign affairs were in need of the greatest change.

It's felt quite lacking in my perspective. Minister level seems to be going smooth for the most part, not sure about what's going on above that but I haven't seen much.

Very disappointed that the President has decided not to go through with the States. As the main issue I voted on, I'll be very determined to see the President out of office at the end of this term if no statement or progress is made on this.

The time has come for a real lower house. Empower the CA!

Senate Elections

Of those who answered our poll, 65.8 percent were not intending to run for Senate, while 34.8 percent were considering it. Not one respondent was willing to say that yes, they were intending to run, which robbed the EBC of getting the exclusive on potential candidates! 30 percent of older members said that they were considering running, while 41.7 percent of newer members said the same.


Unsurprisingly, 90.9 percent of respondents would vote to re-elect Malashaan. Senators Malashaan and Cerian Quilor are the only ones that a majority of voters would re-elect, though. Interestingly, 36.4 percent would vote to re-elect JayDee, although only 30.4 percent approve of his job performance. This may feed the narrative that voters have appreciated his effort, even if they didn't always approve his actions.

Besides current Senators, poll respondents were also asked to identify potential candidates for the current election. Here are the candidates you want to see:


It's a diverse group, with new and old members alike leading the pack. Leading the pack of desired candidates are Drecq, Punchwood, and XIV, with members like Leo Drakan, Aexnidaral, Writinglegend, and Notolecta not far behind. The above graphic shows how there is truly a pool of candidates that voters want to see. Whether those candidates decide to get in this round is another matter entirely.

And that may be why voters are unexcited about this Senate election. Only 26.1 percent say that they're optimistic for these elections, with 39.1 percent pessimistic and 34.8 percent unsure. In general, voters are in a malaise. While many seem dissatisfied and lukewarm on much in the region, there is still some hope that this round of Senate elections will bring a refreshed drive. We shall soon see if that hope turns out to be false.
 
Really interesting stuff here.
 
Great insight, Mac! I especially loved the graphic showing the names of individuals that people wanted to see in the Senate.
 
I hope people realize that the Senate doesn't write treaties. The passage of CAIN "2.0", or any other treaty for that matter, can't be counted as their accomplishment. A lot of work goes into these things and senators do none of it. I'm hopeful that citing it's passage is simply a side effect of not knowing what else to say or not being familiar with whatever else is going on in the Senate.
 
Lesson learned

Don't spend sleepless nights trying to create procedures for a Civil hearing because you'll just be called 'too ambitous.'
 
A lot to think about here.
 
Interesting results and analysis. JayDee, your comment is a mischaracterization of the actual comment to which you are referring. You seem to think that what you did was seen as negative because of being "too ambitious," as if the core problem is too much ambition = bad. But that's not what the comment is implying; its implying that it was too ambitious as in too big of an endeavor for a junior Senator to take on. Now, I think there is some merit to discussing why we assume Junior Senators can't necessarily handle "big" legislative ideas.
 
That's probably a better take on it. I just think it's a bad word to be throwing around. Trying to start a project to rewrite the Judicature Act, ambitious but doable. Running for President? That is definitely over ambitous at this point.

EDIT: All I'm going to say is that I don't think it was over ambitious. If it was a Senate full of other people like me, I would definitely agree. Considering we had people like Malashaan and CQ in the Senate, I was confident it would be a doable project for the Senate.
 
Cerian Quilor said:
I am very surprised about the reaction to JayDee here.
I'd definitely agree with that.
 
I want to start off by saying that I think this is the best article I have read from the EBC so far. In goes into such interesting depth, and I am astounded by its quality.

I am in disbelief at JayDee's approval rating. I honest though he was a great senator. Can any critic, privately or publicly, speak about what they disliked about him? Because I honestly thought that my criteria judging senators was acceptable, but evidently, they don't match up with other Europeians.

Seeing I got a mention as a desired senate candidate really made me happy...if only I was qualified.
 
Why don't you think you're qualified?
 
I'll join the crowd of people that thought JayDee was much better than this poll indicated - he was consistently active, and while his aggressive questioning of the Cabinet may be controversial, it was a big change from the usual rubber-stamp.

And also, will the list of comments under "Other" be fully released? I said "Other" to all but Mal and Cerian because it was the only way I could get my comments in.
 
Cool stuff here, McEntire. I especially like the graphics. The word cloud is a neat way to show support for potential candidates.

I will say that I'm not running. Truthfully, I've considered it... but over the next two months my boyfriend and I will be spending a lot of time looking for a new place to move to before our lease is up. I'm just tired-- and I need some time for myself. I've been almost consistently in elected office since, what December of 2015, or January of 2016? I have been one of the focal points of our domestic electoral politics for more than a year and I just need a break. Thank you to those who put my name down as someone you'd like to see run-- it's genuinely touching to be considered as a candidate someone would like to cast a ballot for. The last term left me feeling especially drained and empty. I'll be back sometime-- but just not now.
 
I have to say, I agree to an extent with the comment that I got a good score because of my past work. I'll be the first to admit that my contributions have been average this term; I just haven't had the time to commit that I would like so I have been focusing on high-level review. That's an important function for sure, but what this term needed was more people willing and able to do the nitty-gritty work of legislative drafting. I've done that at times in the past, but RL got in the way this term. Drecq did a lot of it last term, and it was greatly appreciated. I also agree that JayDee deserves a better score. He tried admirably to fill that void, but the rest of us failed to give him the support he needed as a first term Senator.

Overall, this was a term of keeping the trains running on time. Nothing horrendous happened, and we have set up some issues for the next Senate to address, but we could and should have done a lot more. That is why I haven not stood for the next term (and will not do so). I know that I won't be able to commit enough time to the Senate in view of my real life commitments and the work I want to put into the World Assembly. What the Senate needs right now in dedicated people who have a lot of time to put into it, and that is not me right now.
 
Lethen said:
Why don't you think you're qualified?
The main reasons: I'm not aware of all the bills being considered, I need to know more about producing legislation and its formatting, and I don't know enough about legislation that has already been passed. Overall, I'd rather take time to learn everything about government functions and Europeian history, rather than rushing myself into position I fear I can't adequately fulfill.
 
Back
Top