- Pronouns
- He/Him
Which eight do you expect to vote for in next week's election?
You don't plan on utilizing all of your votes? Though I understand and respect the principle behind this decision, I worry that should many go by such a standard, the best eight may not get in.Three's only three I'm decided on. The rest I'm still thinking.
Me, McEntire and Rachel Anumia. I'll probably vote for Indy and Anumia as well.
Is there anyone you 'categorically oppose' in this election?Well, the election isn't here yet. No doubt more people will sign up.
And I'm certainly not going to vote for someone I catagorically oppose, even if that means I end up not using all my votes.
I almost never use all my votes. Typically I prefer to vote for the people I know want to be in the Senate, as spreading my vote to people I'm not sure about it makes it easier for the people I am sure about to get ousted. Though I have considered it, I didn't vote for just me while I was running, which is a viable strategy for a Candidate to get an uncontested vote.You don't plan on utilizing all of your votes? Though I understand and respect the principle behind this decision, I worry that should many go by such a standard, the best eight may not get in.Three's only three I'm decided on. The rest I'm still thinking.
Me, McEntire and Rachel Anumia. I'll probably vote for Indy and Anumia as well.
At the moment, no offense, you.Is there anyone you 'categorically oppose' in this election?Well, the election isn't here yet. No doubt more people will sign up.
And I'm certainly not going to vote for someone I catagorically oppose, even if that means I end up not using all my votes.
So with that we're saying we only care about perhaps the top half of the Senate and show no concern with who will fill the rest?I almost never use all my votes. Typically I prefer to vote for the people I know want to be in the Senate, as spreading my vote to people I'm not sure about it makes it easier for the people I am sure about to get ousted. Though I have considered it, I didn't vote for just me while I was running, which is a viable strategy for a Candidate to get an uncontested vote.You don't plan on utilizing all of your votes? Though I understand and respect the principle behind this decision, I worry that should many go by such a standard, the best eight may not get in.Three's only three I'm decided on. The rest I'm still thinking.
Me, McEntire and Rachel Anumia. I'll probably vote for Indy and Anumia as well.
No offense taken, of course. Though you'll find the majority of the region does agree with me on those issues.At the moment, no offense, you.Is there anyone you 'categorically oppose' in this election?Well, the election isn't here yet. No doubt more people will sign up.
And I'm certainly not going to vote for someone I catagorically oppose, even if that means I end up not using all my votes.
You have stated your catagorical opposition to a Bicameral Legislature, and that is something I support. Your catagorical opposition to a regional economy - which I have mixed feelings on - doesn't really help your case in my eyes.
Well, there seems to be a bit more evenness on bicameral (though I could be seeing that wrong), but even if I was the only one, I have my principles, and I will stick to them.No offense taken, of course. Though you'll find the majority of the region does agree with me on those issues.At the moment, no offense, you.Is there anyone you 'categorically oppose' in this election?Well, the election isn't here yet. No doubt more people will sign up.
And I'm certainly not going to vote for someone I catagorically oppose, even if that means I end up not using all my votes.
You have stated your catagorical opposition to a Bicameral Legislature, and that is something I support. Your catagorical opposition to a regional economy - which I have mixed feelings on - doesn't really help your case in my eyes.
Absolutely not. I'm saying in most elections there are five or six candidates I would very much like to see elected, and I would hate to lose the people I care about getting elected by voting for the people I care less about getting elected. There's no "we" here, it's a personal decision about how best to get the people I would like to see in the Senate into the Senate. The more you concentrate your vote, the stronger it is for the people you do vote for, the less you concentrate it, the broader your influence. It's a tradeoff, I usually personally cast about 2/3 to 3/4 of my available votes. If you're wondering, I cast 6 in this poll.So with that we're saying we only care about perhaps the top half of the Senate and show no concern with who will fill the rest?I almost never use all my votes. Typically I prefer to vote for the people I know want to be in the Senate, as spreading my vote to people I'm not sure about it makes it easier for the people I am sure about to get ousted. Though I have considered it, I didn't vote for just me while I was running, which is a viable strategy for a Candidate to get an uncontested vote.You don't plan on utilizing all of your votes? Though I understand and respect the principle behind this decision, I worry that should many go by such a standard, the best eight may not get in.Three's only three I'm decided on. The rest I'm still thinking.
Me, McEntire and Rachel Anumia. I'll probably vote for Indy and Anumia as well.
:lol: Nice.It never occurred to me to use less than my maximum number of votes.