Former Presidents Lethen, PhDre and Rachel Anumia along with Deputy Mayor Jairo discuss the elections.
Lisa = Me
Mark = Lethen
Ph = PhDre
Philippe = Jairo
Lisa says: (6:00:52 PM)
So who has the advantage going into this election?
Mark says: (6:01:18 PM)
Presidential or Senatorial?
Lisa says: (6:01:34 PM)
Presidential
Philippe says: (6:01:41 PM)
From what I can see not Oga
Lisa says: (6:02:35 PM)
I don't think Skizzy Grey's inititial platform wasn't enough given NES's
Lisa says: (6:02:52 PM)
I think NES can win in the first round -if- it sinks in.
Ph says: (6:03:07 PM)
I dont think that NES will catch as much flak as he should for his lack of a platform for a week
Philippe says: (6:03:31 PM)
I agree
Mark says: (6:03:50 PM)
I haven't even read his platform yet
Philippe says: (6:04:01 PM)
you mean his book?
Lisa says: (6:04:13 PM)
Well, the irony is that it may actually end up being an advantage. I personally think it was a mistake by OO to highlight how "Europeian" he is, as a jab towards NES.
Lisa says: (6:04:46 PM)
Personally, I feel that OO is under-rated and could pick up more of the vote than people give him credit for.
Mark says: (6:05:40 PM)
OO has definitely worked his tail off lately
Mark says: (6:05:45 PM)
but...he's also undermined himself
Mark says: (6:06:22 PM)
He lost a lot of legitimacy in people's eyes when he wrote those one or two articles attacking CSP and Rachel, and...you shouldn't run for President after barely being active the last term
Lisa says: (6:07:16 PM)
Mhmm, I think that if one wishes to run for President they really have to build themselves for it the term before.
Philippe says: (6:07:33 PM)
Yeah, the first post I saw from him was his stand for presidency
Ph says: (6:07:46 PM)
I think that OO had a much better chance with just Skizzy in the picture. Now that NES has a formidable platform, it makes OO's seem very stale by comparison
Mark says: (6:08:18 PM)
I'd also be lying if I said I wasn't biased and didn't really read any of OO's platform or speeches...
Mark says: (6:08:18 PM)
brb
Lisa says: (6:08:59 PM)
Predicted Result of the First Round?
Mark says: (6:09:50 PM)
Lethen sweeps in and outflanks the opponent to hit a home run touchdown into the endzone right past the goaltender
Mark says: (6:09:56 PM)
brb again...
Lisa says: (6:11:51 PM)
haha, another question..
Lisa says: (6:11:57 PM)
VP Candidates?
Philippe says: (6:13:07 PM)
I think Swak is good quality. I've been impressed with the work he has done in almost every area of Euro life.
Ph says: (6:13:59 PM)
I think Swak is the best of the VP candidates
Lisa says: (6:13:59 PM)
Lethen highlighted his attitude towards other senatorial candidates.
Ph says: (6:14:19 PM)
PASD is a strange choice in that NES didnt highlight him at all in his platform
Ph says: (6:14:22 PM)
Seemed also a tack on
Lisa says: (6:15:17 PM)
PASD has FA, Senatorial and Mayoral experience. Out of all the teams besides OO, he is the only one with the latter experience.
Lisa says: (6:15:31 PM)
Could that make a difference?
Ph says: (6:16:05 PM)
PASD has not been stressed at all by NES as a teammate
Philippe says: (6:16:19 PM)
Senatorial and Mayoral experiencee are similar though
Ph says: (6:16:28 PM)
Perhaps being a Mayor will help NES win the election, but it doesn't bode well for the actual term
Mark says: (6:16:28 PM)
I think the only real issue with Swak is that he may slip up during the term and fuck up communication with the Senate
Mark says: (6:16:47 PM)
We've all seen Swak get a little bit pissy on the forums when he doesn't bother telling people about changes
Mark says: (6:17:02 PM)
How will he act when those people are 7 Senators, and he doesn't like most of the field anyway ?
Lisa says: (6:18:24 PM)
While NES didn't mention PASD much in his manifesto they do seem to be fairly close. The opposite case of this, would seem to be Seymour and Ogastein...
Lisa says: (6:19:39 PM)
It's been a bit of an odd election for Seymour, now dropping out of the Senatorial race after CSP, Jairo and myself declared their intentions
Ph says: (6:19:53 PM)
I dont care if you arent close, being unable to acknowledge the other half of your ticket in a professional setting is not a good sign, period.
Ph says: (6:20:19 PM)
And NES's inability to do that with PASD is not a good sign regardless of whether they are fairly close
Lisa says: (6:21:56 PM)
I would say it was simply something he over-looked. There is a stronger case that someone would highlight the VP more if they weren't as close.
Ph says: (6:22:43 PM)
I dont think you can over look half your ticket and not raise concerns. Its definitely something to look out for moving forward.
Lisa says: (6:23:40 PM)
One thing that's disappointed me this election is the interjection of spammy comments in literally every thread.
Mark says: (6:23:53 PM)
What defines that, though? I know that when I ran as VP with Lex as President, he maybe devoted 2 sentences to me. Noone cared then.
Lisa says: (6:23:55 PM)
I want to know where people stand...
Lisa says: (6:24:17 PM)
You were VP with Lex? (case in point joke)
Ph says: (6:24:36 PM)
Ill second your annoyance with spammy comments
Mark says: (6:24:36 PM)
I served as his VP at least once
Mark says: (6:24:42 PM)
Aurora served like twice, thrice maybe
Lisa says: (6:24:43 PM)
not really though, those were great terms.
Mark says: (6:24:52 PM)
as his VP
Mark says: (6:25:21 PM)
I don't play records
Lisa says: (6:26:32 PM)
if a big time politician were to endorse a candidate, would it make a big difference?
Mark says: (6:26:40 PM)
Yes
Lisa says: (6:26:42 PM)
/solidify a result
Mark says: (6:26:42 PM)
Case and point me
Ph says: (6:26:58 PM)
Depends who you consider big time, really
Ph says: (6:27:04 PM)
Yes, butthurt is a thing
Mark says: (6:27:11 PM)
Which isn't being cocky. If me, or Anumia, or Lexus (maybe not Lexus as much anymore) endorsed someone
Ph says: (6:27:40 PM)
It would help for sure
Mark says: (6:27:41 PM)
that'd be a significant boost. One could argue its more due to private convos in MSN where, inevitably, elections come up and we talk about liking that particular person and what they have to offer.
Ph says: (6:27:47 PM)
mhm
Mark says: (6:27:58 PM)
speaking of which, PhDre, I really hate gyros
Mark says: (6:28:01 PM)
Gyros are terrible
Mark says: (6:28:13 PM)
*subconsciously makes you vote for anyone but Jairo*
Mark says: (6:28:15 PM)
Don't you agree?
Lisa says: (6:28:57 PM)
lol
Lisa says: (6:29:07 PM)
When do polls open?
Philippe says: (6:29:25 PM)
hey now!
Ph says: (6:29:38 PM)
Gyros are delicious.
Philippe says: (6:29:38 PM)
Gyros/Jairo is awesome
Lisa says: (6:29:52 PM)
JGlenn just posted his support of NES
Ph says: (6:30:32 PM)
Probably wont make a difference, to be honest
Ph says: (6:30:49 PM)
Maybe a vote or two influenced
Lisa says: (6:30:50 PM)
He's a politician who I hope continues to try to do bigger things. The VPship could be his prime moment.
Ph says: (6:31:07 PM)
Mm, I agree. He wasn't a very vocal VP
Ph says: (6:31:11 PM)
Or outstanding VP
Ph says: (6:31:17 PM)
Which doesnt help his future political chances
Lisa says: (6:32:13 PM)
The problem with VP's is that you really need someone who are tight allies with. Else, the VP will be scared of screwing up etc etc
Ph says: (6:32:32 PM)
I dont agree you need a tight ally as VP
Ph says: (6:32:33 PM)
At all
Ph says: (6:32:44 PM)
I could work with a VP
Ph says: (6:32:46 PM)
or as a VP
Ph says: (6:32:51 PM)
with someone who Im not close with personally
Ph says: (6:32:57 PM)
Or are an 'ally' with
Ph says: (6:33:24 PM)
It requires maturity, yes, to allow yourself to be a critic and an alternative perspective inside of the administration
Ph says: (6:33:29 PM)
while furthering Europeian interests
Ph says: (6:33:33 PM)
and doing what you have to
Ph says: (6:33:43 PM)
But I comlpetely disagree that you need to have a tight ally as a VP
Mark says: (6:34:07 PM)
you just need to have an actual agenda
Lisa says: (6:34:51 PM)
Idk, I just think of myself and NES. We aren't afraid to criticize the other though... which is what I think makes a great ally.
Mark says: (6:35:01 PM)
eh
Mark says: (6:35:30 PM)
True, to an extent. Every VP I've ever had or every President I've ever been VP to have had that relationship with me
Mark says: (6:35:37 PM)
HEM, Lex, etc.
Lisa says: (6:36:30 PM)
If there were debates, who would be favoured?
Mark says: (6:38:41 PM)
That's a tough one
Mark says: (6:38:44 PM)
I'd lean towards NES
Mark says: (6:38:52 PM)
but I feel like Skizzy could keep it interesting
Mark says: (6:39:01 PM)
VP-wise? Hmm...Swak
Ph says: (6:39:21 PM)
NES or Skizzy would come away with the debate
Ph says: (6:39:39 PM)
I hate to put OO at a lower tier, but that's just the reality of the situation
Ph says: (6:40:03 PM)
VP wise I think Swak has the most experience and would be the best VP, not sure if that would translate well to a debate
Lisa says: (6:40:51 PM)
I agree with PhDre about the VP. Swakistek seems to go into Presidential elections as a very strong candidate and then wane as they go on
Lisa says: (6:41:13 PM)
At least, that was the case when he went up against Sopo. I believe he had the initial advantage.
Ph says: (6:41:59 PM)
I also think he compliments Skizzy better than other VP's compliment their Presidential candidate
Mark says: (6:43:21 PM)
In a pure debate, I honestly don't see Seymour or PASD outdebating Swak. Maybe I'm underestimating them, but Seymour would somehow get off topic, and PASD...wouldn't be on topic enough
Lisa says: (6:43:57 PM)
I disagree about PASD, I think he can bring it when he wants to.
Ph says: (6:44:14 PM)
I dont think he can bring it against Swak and win
Lisa says: (6:45:14 PM)
In many ways, he's the darkhorse VP. I do think that this election is more exciting than the last few
Ph says: (6:46:02 PM)
I mean, we dont elect Presidents based on the strength of their VP
Ph says: (6:46:07 PM)
I think PASD is not a strong VP candidate
Ph says: (6:46:13 PM)
but NES is strong enough on top to
Ph says: (6:46:19 PM)
prevent people from worrying too much about him
Mark says: (6:46:20 PM)
lol I find it funny that we're all here lauding Swak, but the minute he gets uppity, we all make fun of him/yell at him/frown at him
Mark says: (6:47:20 PM)
haha as an aside, he was ranting to me the other day about the Senate (candidates and those who just served)
Mark says: (6:47:26 PM)
The boy has high expectations
Mark says: (6:47:42 PM)
For everyone else
Lisa says: (6:48:22 PM)
yup
Lisa says: (6:48:37 PM)
Okay, so who is the strongest Presidential candidate and why?
Mark says: (6:48:54 PM)
NES
Ph says: (6:49:06 PM)
Agreed
Ph says: (6:49:13 PM)
While his platform is incredibly and inexcusably late
Ph says: (6:49:27 PM)
His ideas are more solid than either of his two opponents
Ph says: (6:49:52 PM)
And has demonstrated that he's not willing to just be a status quo president
Mark says: (6:50:02 PM)
Because I said so! No, not really (yes really). Because he's active enough to dispel any activity worries; he's got a real hold on foreign policy that I don't think many of us really grasp; he's got actual knowledge about how to run the Navy; etc. etc.
Mark says: (6:50:15 PM)
And he does my dry-cleaning
Lisa says: (6:53:01 PM)
I also think it seems like his "time"
Mark says: (6:53:27 PM)
Why do you say that?
Lisa says: (6:54:11 PM)
He seems to have grown tremendously as a Europeian politician lately. Few remember his time when he was a "Foreigner" GA and regarded as an outlier.
Lisa says: (6:54:45 PM)
First being appointed DEIA, then elected Senator, MoFA and VP.
Mark says: (6:54:54 PM)
Mr. Grey would disagree to that with an eloquent F-ck you
Mark says: (6:54:55 PM)
lol
Lisa says: (6:55:07 PM)
haha
Lisa says: (6:55:46 PM)
I like Skizzy but NES is in a better position
Lisa says: (6:55:58 PM)
and I think Europeians will reward him for his work lately
Mark says: (6:56:36 PM)
Indeed
Mark says: (6:56:37 PM)
he
Mark says: (6:56:39 PM)
has
Mark says: (6:56:41 PM)
assimilated
Mark says: (6:56:46 PM)
the Europeian Borg Society did well
Lisa says: (6:56:57 PM)
When I look at JGlenn's endorsing of him, I think it reflects the "new" generation
Philippe says: (6:57:24 PM)
woah what did I miss?
Mark says: (6:57:31 PM)
Ah, the new generation. The past new generation tried to protect Falc. The new new generation likes NES
Ph says: (6:57:50 PM)
Lisa says: (6:58:08 PM)
In many ways, it's a bit of a carry over from my own terms
Lisa says: (6:58:31 PM)
at least in the second one, he was really loved by the cabinet members
Philippe says: (6:58:48 PM)
history lesson pwease
Lisa says: (6:59:21 PM)
argh idk where to begin
Philippe says: (6:59:26 PM)
lol
Philippe says: (6:59:33 PM)
you can send me a link
Lisa says: (7:01:02 PM)
Does NES win in the first round as it stands?
Philippe says: (7:02:07 PM)
going off the points you guys brought up I'd say yes
Ph says: (7:03:28 PM)
Probably
Ph says: (7:03:32 PM)
I dont see OO getting that many votes
Lisa says: (7:04:02 PM)
I think he will as well
Lisa says: (7:04:20 PM)
As well, I view this as a tremendously positive election
Ph says: (7:05:51 PM)
I think this would have been a much more constructive election if NES had posted his platform a few days ago
Lisa says: (7:07:08 PM)
Haha, although the "never say never" and fourth quarter pushes have come to define Europeian elections
Philippe says: (7:08:05 PM)
yes, he had a unique opportunity to win a significant amount of votes had he posted earlier, but maybe this was his strategy.
Lisa says: (7:08:45 PM)
kk, so any last words on this election?
Ph says: (7:09:27 PM)
I mean less in terms of electoral strategy but
Ph says: (7:09:33 PM)
being a positive moment for Europeia
Ph says: (7:09:41 PM)
more time to discuss and disect the visions of the candidates is warranted
Ph says: (7:09:56 PM)
we deserve more time than we're getting this election
Philippe says: (7:10:34 PM)
Ahhh, true
Mark says: (7:11:35 PM)
On NES platform: I don't know if it was a deliberate strategy, but it does merit some consideration as to its own...merits. How many times have we seen platforms go up quickly and then get progressively dissected and destroyed in a week? If anything, putting up a platform now doesn't give the voters and critics the chance to get out of the "Honeymoon" phase, and he can make sure he tailors it
Mark says: (7:11:44 PM)
to avoid the drawbacks of his fellow candidates' platforms
Mark says: (7:11:45 PM)
g2g
Mark says: (7:11:48 PM)
be back in a few
Mark has left the conversation.
Ph says: (7:12:35 PM)
I agree with Leth. It might be a way to win an election - post a novel the day before the election with a series of potentially sound policies - but its definitely not positive for Europeia.
Lisa says: (7:14:17 PM)
Well, I look forward to watching the elections...
Lisa says: (7:14:46 PM)
Apparently there is also some small American sports game going on, but the Euro elections will be the real draw
Ph says: (7:14:47 PM)
I mean, that's one thing. But let's not pretend this is a positive moment for Europeia when there's no real debate, just spamming in election threads. We've seen more constructive elections
Ph says: (7:14:54 PM)
Much more*
Lisa says: (7:15:26 PM)
Ah, I meant more in terms of candidates and that there hasn't been massive controversy such as when Sopo faced off against Seymour
Ph says: (7:16:00 PM)
I mean, I just dont think its a positive election. It's pretty bland to be honest
Lisa says: (7:16:29 PM)
Hopefully, things will heat up more.
Lisa says: (7:16:37 PM)
kk, I'm putting this thing up
Ph says: (7:16:48 PM)
There's little time for things to heat up, like I said
Ph says: (7:17:00 PM)
Had NES's platform been up a few days ago, then yes
Lisa says: (7:17:22 PM)
Three former Presidents and Jairo?
Philippe says: (7:19:49 PM)
haha
Lisa = Me
Mark = Lethen
Ph = PhDre
Philippe = Jairo
Lisa says: (6:00:52 PM)
So who has the advantage going into this election?
Mark says: (6:01:18 PM)
Presidential or Senatorial?
Lisa says: (6:01:34 PM)
Presidential
Philippe says: (6:01:41 PM)
From what I can see not Oga
Lisa says: (6:02:35 PM)
I don't think Skizzy Grey's inititial platform wasn't enough given NES's
Lisa says: (6:02:52 PM)
I think NES can win in the first round -if- it sinks in.
Ph says: (6:03:07 PM)
I dont think that NES will catch as much flak as he should for his lack of a platform for a week
Philippe says: (6:03:31 PM)
I agree
Mark says: (6:03:50 PM)
I haven't even read his platform yet
Philippe says: (6:04:01 PM)
you mean his book?
Lisa says: (6:04:13 PM)
Well, the irony is that it may actually end up being an advantage. I personally think it was a mistake by OO to highlight how "Europeian" he is, as a jab towards NES.
Lisa says: (6:04:46 PM)
Personally, I feel that OO is under-rated and could pick up more of the vote than people give him credit for.
Mark says: (6:05:40 PM)
OO has definitely worked his tail off lately
Mark says: (6:05:45 PM)
but...he's also undermined himself
Mark says: (6:06:22 PM)
He lost a lot of legitimacy in people's eyes when he wrote those one or two articles attacking CSP and Rachel, and...you shouldn't run for President after barely being active the last term
Lisa says: (6:07:16 PM)
Mhmm, I think that if one wishes to run for President they really have to build themselves for it the term before.
Philippe says: (6:07:33 PM)
Yeah, the first post I saw from him was his stand for presidency
Ph says: (6:07:46 PM)
I think that OO had a much better chance with just Skizzy in the picture. Now that NES has a formidable platform, it makes OO's seem very stale by comparison
Mark says: (6:08:18 PM)
I'd also be lying if I said I wasn't biased and didn't really read any of OO's platform or speeches...
Mark says: (6:08:18 PM)
brb
Lisa says: (6:08:59 PM)
Predicted Result of the First Round?
Mark says: (6:09:50 PM)
Lethen sweeps in and outflanks the opponent to hit a home run touchdown into the endzone right past the goaltender
Mark says: (6:09:56 PM)
brb again...
Lisa says: (6:11:51 PM)
haha, another question..
Lisa says: (6:11:57 PM)
VP Candidates?
Philippe says: (6:13:07 PM)
I think Swak is good quality. I've been impressed with the work he has done in almost every area of Euro life.
Ph says: (6:13:59 PM)
I think Swak is the best of the VP candidates
Lisa says: (6:13:59 PM)
Lethen highlighted his attitude towards other senatorial candidates.
Ph says: (6:14:19 PM)
PASD is a strange choice in that NES didnt highlight him at all in his platform
Ph says: (6:14:22 PM)
Seemed also a tack on
Lisa says: (6:15:17 PM)
PASD has FA, Senatorial and Mayoral experience. Out of all the teams besides OO, he is the only one with the latter experience.
Lisa says: (6:15:31 PM)
Could that make a difference?
Ph says: (6:16:05 PM)
PASD has not been stressed at all by NES as a teammate
Philippe says: (6:16:19 PM)
Senatorial and Mayoral experiencee are similar though
Ph says: (6:16:28 PM)
Perhaps being a Mayor will help NES win the election, but it doesn't bode well for the actual term
Mark says: (6:16:28 PM)
I think the only real issue with Swak is that he may slip up during the term and fuck up communication with the Senate
Mark says: (6:16:47 PM)
We've all seen Swak get a little bit pissy on the forums when he doesn't bother telling people about changes
Mark says: (6:17:02 PM)
How will he act when those people are 7 Senators, and he doesn't like most of the field anyway ?
Lisa says: (6:18:24 PM)
While NES didn't mention PASD much in his manifesto they do seem to be fairly close. The opposite case of this, would seem to be Seymour and Ogastein...
Lisa says: (6:19:39 PM)
It's been a bit of an odd election for Seymour, now dropping out of the Senatorial race after CSP, Jairo and myself declared their intentions
Ph says: (6:19:53 PM)
I dont care if you arent close, being unable to acknowledge the other half of your ticket in a professional setting is not a good sign, period.
Ph says: (6:20:19 PM)
And NES's inability to do that with PASD is not a good sign regardless of whether they are fairly close
Lisa says: (6:21:56 PM)
I would say it was simply something he over-looked. There is a stronger case that someone would highlight the VP more if they weren't as close.
Ph says: (6:22:43 PM)
I dont think you can over look half your ticket and not raise concerns. Its definitely something to look out for moving forward.
Lisa says: (6:23:40 PM)
One thing that's disappointed me this election is the interjection of spammy comments in literally every thread.
Mark says: (6:23:53 PM)
What defines that, though? I know that when I ran as VP with Lex as President, he maybe devoted 2 sentences to me. Noone cared then.
Lisa says: (6:23:55 PM)
I want to know where people stand...
Lisa says: (6:24:17 PM)
You were VP with Lex? (case in point joke)
Ph says: (6:24:36 PM)
Ill second your annoyance with spammy comments
Mark says: (6:24:36 PM)
I served as his VP at least once
Mark says: (6:24:42 PM)
Aurora served like twice, thrice maybe
Lisa says: (6:24:43 PM)
not really though, those were great terms.
Mark says: (6:24:52 PM)
as his VP
Mark says: (6:25:21 PM)
I don't play records
Lisa says: (6:26:32 PM)
if a big time politician were to endorse a candidate, would it make a big difference?
Mark says: (6:26:40 PM)
Yes
Lisa says: (6:26:42 PM)
/solidify a result
Mark says: (6:26:42 PM)
Case and point me
Ph says: (6:26:58 PM)
Depends who you consider big time, really
Ph says: (6:27:04 PM)
Yes, butthurt is a thing
Mark says: (6:27:11 PM)
Which isn't being cocky. If me, or Anumia, or Lexus (maybe not Lexus as much anymore) endorsed someone
Ph says: (6:27:40 PM)
It would help for sure
Mark says: (6:27:41 PM)
that'd be a significant boost. One could argue its more due to private convos in MSN where, inevitably, elections come up and we talk about liking that particular person and what they have to offer.
Ph says: (6:27:47 PM)
mhm
Mark says: (6:27:58 PM)
speaking of which, PhDre, I really hate gyros
Mark says: (6:28:01 PM)
Gyros are terrible
Mark says: (6:28:13 PM)
*subconsciously makes you vote for anyone but Jairo*
Mark says: (6:28:15 PM)
Don't you agree?
Lisa says: (6:28:57 PM)
lol
Lisa says: (6:29:07 PM)
When do polls open?
Philippe says: (6:29:25 PM)
hey now!
Ph says: (6:29:38 PM)
Gyros are delicious.
Philippe says: (6:29:38 PM)
Gyros/Jairo is awesome
Lisa says: (6:29:52 PM)
JGlenn just posted his support of NES
Ph says: (6:30:32 PM)
Probably wont make a difference, to be honest
Ph says: (6:30:49 PM)
Maybe a vote or two influenced
Lisa says: (6:30:50 PM)
He's a politician who I hope continues to try to do bigger things. The VPship could be his prime moment.
Ph says: (6:31:07 PM)
Mm, I agree. He wasn't a very vocal VP
Ph says: (6:31:11 PM)
Or outstanding VP
Ph says: (6:31:17 PM)
Which doesnt help his future political chances
Lisa says: (6:32:13 PM)
The problem with VP's is that you really need someone who are tight allies with. Else, the VP will be scared of screwing up etc etc
Ph says: (6:32:32 PM)
I dont agree you need a tight ally as VP
Ph says: (6:32:33 PM)
At all
Ph says: (6:32:44 PM)
I could work with a VP
Ph says: (6:32:46 PM)
or as a VP
Ph says: (6:32:51 PM)
with someone who Im not close with personally
Ph says: (6:32:57 PM)
Or are an 'ally' with
Ph says: (6:33:24 PM)
It requires maturity, yes, to allow yourself to be a critic and an alternative perspective inside of the administration
Ph says: (6:33:29 PM)
while furthering Europeian interests
Ph says: (6:33:33 PM)
and doing what you have to
Ph says: (6:33:43 PM)
But I comlpetely disagree that you need to have a tight ally as a VP
Mark says: (6:34:07 PM)
you just need to have an actual agenda
Lisa says: (6:34:51 PM)
Idk, I just think of myself and NES. We aren't afraid to criticize the other though... which is what I think makes a great ally.
Mark says: (6:35:01 PM)
eh
Mark says: (6:35:30 PM)
True, to an extent. Every VP I've ever had or every President I've ever been VP to have had that relationship with me
Mark says: (6:35:37 PM)
HEM, Lex, etc.
Lisa says: (6:36:30 PM)
If there were debates, who would be favoured?
Mark says: (6:38:41 PM)
That's a tough one
Mark says: (6:38:44 PM)
I'd lean towards NES
Mark says: (6:38:52 PM)
but I feel like Skizzy could keep it interesting
Mark says: (6:39:01 PM)
VP-wise? Hmm...Swak
Ph says: (6:39:21 PM)
NES or Skizzy would come away with the debate
Ph says: (6:39:39 PM)
I hate to put OO at a lower tier, but that's just the reality of the situation
Ph says: (6:40:03 PM)
VP wise I think Swak has the most experience and would be the best VP, not sure if that would translate well to a debate
Lisa says: (6:40:51 PM)
I agree with PhDre about the VP. Swakistek seems to go into Presidential elections as a very strong candidate and then wane as they go on
Lisa says: (6:41:13 PM)
At least, that was the case when he went up against Sopo. I believe he had the initial advantage.
Ph says: (6:41:59 PM)
I also think he compliments Skizzy better than other VP's compliment their Presidential candidate
Mark says: (6:43:21 PM)
In a pure debate, I honestly don't see Seymour or PASD outdebating Swak. Maybe I'm underestimating them, but Seymour would somehow get off topic, and PASD...wouldn't be on topic enough
Lisa says: (6:43:57 PM)
I disagree about PASD, I think he can bring it when he wants to.
Ph says: (6:44:14 PM)
I dont think he can bring it against Swak and win
Lisa says: (6:45:14 PM)
In many ways, he's the darkhorse VP. I do think that this election is more exciting than the last few
Ph says: (6:46:02 PM)
I mean, we dont elect Presidents based on the strength of their VP
Ph says: (6:46:07 PM)
I think PASD is not a strong VP candidate
Ph says: (6:46:13 PM)
but NES is strong enough on top to
Ph says: (6:46:19 PM)
prevent people from worrying too much about him
Mark says: (6:46:20 PM)
lol I find it funny that we're all here lauding Swak, but the minute he gets uppity, we all make fun of him/yell at him/frown at him
Mark says: (6:47:20 PM)
haha as an aside, he was ranting to me the other day about the Senate (candidates and those who just served)
Mark says: (6:47:26 PM)
The boy has high expectations
Mark says: (6:47:42 PM)
For everyone else
Lisa says: (6:48:22 PM)
yup
Lisa says: (6:48:37 PM)
Okay, so who is the strongest Presidential candidate and why?
Mark says: (6:48:54 PM)
NES
Ph says: (6:49:06 PM)
Agreed
Ph says: (6:49:13 PM)
While his platform is incredibly and inexcusably late
Ph says: (6:49:27 PM)
His ideas are more solid than either of his two opponents
Ph says: (6:49:52 PM)
And has demonstrated that he's not willing to just be a status quo president
Mark says: (6:50:02 PM)
Because I said so! No, not really (yes really). Because he's active enough to dispel any activity worries; he's got a real hold on foreign policy that I don't think many of us really grasp; he's got actual knowledge about how to run the Navy; etc. etc.
Mark says: (6:50:15 PM)
And he does my dry-cleaning
Lisa says: (6:53:01 PM)
I also think it seems like his "time"
Mark says: (6:53:27 PM)
Why do you say that?
Lisa says: (6:54:11 PM)
He seems to have grown tremendously as a Europeian politician lately. Few remember his time when he was a "Foreigner" GA and regarded as an outlier.
Lisa says: (6:54:45 PM)
First being appointed DEIA, then elected Senator, MoFA and VP.
Mark says: (6:54:54 PM)
Mr. Grey would disagree to that with an eloquent F-ck you
Mark says: (6:54:55 PM)
lol
Lisa says: (6:55:07 PM)
haha
Lisa says: (6:55:46 PM)
I like Skizzy but NES is in a better position
Lisa says: (6:55:58 PM)
and I think Europeians will reward him for his work lately
Mark says: (6:56:36 PM)
Indeed
Mark says: (6:56:37 PM)
he
Mark says: (6:56:39 PM)
has
Mark says: (6:56:41 PM)
assimilated
Mark says: (6:56:46 PM)
the Europeian Borg Society did well
Lisa says: (6:56:57 PM)
When I look at JGlenn's endorsing of him, I think it reflects the "new" generation
Philippe says: (6:57:24 PM)
woah what did I miss?
Mark says: (6:57:31 PM)
Ah, the new generation. The past new generation tried to protect Falc. The new new generation likes NES
Ph says: (6:57:50 PM)
Lisa says: (6:58:08 PM)
In many ways, it's a bit of a carry over from my own terms
Lisa says: (6:58:31 PM)
at least in the second one, he was really loved by the cabinet members
Philippe says: (6:58:48 PM)
history lesson pwease
Lisa says: (6:59:21 PM)
argh idk where to begin
Philippe says: (6:59:26 PM)
lol
Philippe says: (6:59:33 PM)
you can send me a link
Lisa says: (7:01:02 PM)
Does NES win in the first round as it stands?
Philippe says: (7:02:07 PM)
going off the points you guys brought up I'd say yes
Ph says: (7:03:28 PM)
Probably
Ph says: (7:03:32 PM)
I dont see OO getting that many votes
Lisa says: (7:04:02 PM)
I think he will as well
Lisa says: (7:04:20 PM)
As well, I view this as a tremendously positive election
Ph says: (7:05:51 PM)
I think this would have been a much more constructive election if NES had posted his platform a few days ago
Lisa says: (7:07:08 PM)
Haha, although the "never say never" and fourth quarter pushes have come to define Europeian elections
Philippe says: (7:08:05 PM)
yes, he had a unique opportunity to win a significant amount of votes had he posted earlier, but maybe this was his strategy.
Lisa says: (7:08:45 PM)
kk, so any last words on this election?
Ph says: (7:09:27 PM)
I mean less in terms of electoral strategy but
Ph says: (7:09:33 PM)
being a positive moment for Europeia
Ph says: (7:09:41 PM)
more time to discuss and disect the visions of the candidates is warranted
Ph says: (7:09:56 PM)
we deserve more time than we're getting this election
Philippe says: (7:10:34 PM)
Ahhh, true
Mark says: (7:11:35 PM)
On NES platform: I don't know if it was a deliberate strategy, but it does merit some consideration as to its own...merits. How many times have we seen platforms go up quickly and then get progressively dissected and destroyed in a week? If anything, putting up a platform now doesn't give the voters and critics the chance to get out of the "Honeymoon" phase, and he can make sure he tailors it
Mark says: (7:11:44 PM)
to avoid the drawbacks of his fellow candidates' platforms
Mark says: (7:11:45 PM)
g2g
Mark says: (7:11:48 PM)
be back in a few
Mark has left the conversation.
Ph says: (7:12:35 PM)
I agree with Leth. It might be a way to win an election - post a novel the day before the election with a series of potentially sound policies - but its definitely not positive for Europeia.
Lisa says: (7:14:17 PM)
Well, I look forward to watching the elections...
Lisa says: (7:14:46 PM)
Apparently there is also some small American sports game going on, but the Euro elections will be the real draw
Ph says: (7:14:47 PM)
I mean, that's one thing. But let's not pretend this is a positive moment for Europeia when there's no real debate, just spamming in election threads. We've seen more constructive elections
Ph says: (7:14:54 PM)
Much more*
Lisa says: (7:15:26 PM)
Ah, I meant more in terms of candidates and that there hasn't been massive controversy such as when Sopo faced off against Seymour
Ph says: (7:16:00 PM)
I mean, I just dont think its a positive election. It's pretty bland to be honest
Lisa says: (7:16:29 PM)
Hopefully, things will heat up more.
Lisa says: (7:16:37 PM)
kk, I'm putting this thing up
Ph says: (7:16:48 PM)
There's little time for things to heat up, like I said
Ph says: (7:17:00 PM)
Had NES's platform been up a few days ago, then yes
Lisa says: (7:17:22 PM)
Three former Presidents and Jairo?
Philippe says: (7:19:49 PM)
haha